Essay on adverse possession in wisconsin

After the ruling, the legislature reacted, and amended the adverse possession law in 2008. 46   The legislature changed the hostility element by requiring the adverse user to have a reasonable belief that he has title to the disputed property. 47   In other words, the adverse user may not intentionally trespass and occupy another’s land.  Additionally, the legislature included a provision, which stated that “non-structural encroachments including . . fences, hedges, shrubbery, plantings, [and] sheds” are non-adverse. 48   The legislature also excluded mowing and other “similar maintenance” activities from constituting adverse acts. 49

Essay on adverse possession in wisconsin

essay on adverse possession in wisconsin

Media:

essay on adverse possession in wisconsinessay on adverse possession in wisconsinessay on adverse possession in wisconsinessay on adverse possession in wisconsin